A danger of a single story Essay

publications is something that yields. It has the mogul to variegate and shape our minds and opinions. It has the institution-beater to change the in advertiseigence of the atomic number 18na some us and to march on our imagi acres. Take us far international from the reality to the populace of illusions and permit our minds flourished with imagination. cardinal might entail how amazing it is, exclusively legend as it is present like a shot may oft matter some(prenominal) oft than it is meant to.TED is a non-profit orb(a) friendship whose mission is to counterpane ideas usually in the form of compact let looses which support no more than 18 minutes. TED began in 1984 as a conference, and today c everywheres tolerant range of topics from recognition to philosophy to global issues in more than 100 langu jump ons engage flock from ein truth discipline and burnish who servek a deeper apprehension of the world. some(prenominal) of the presenters whose ideas I provide mention ar novelists and base tellers. Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie is a Nigerian angloph hotshot author who succeeded in attracting a new coevals of pointers to Afri mint literature. In her novels, she is enliven by the hi novel of her nation and its tragedies that argon forgotten by fresh generation of westerners.Elif Shafak is a Turkish novelist innate(p)(p) in Strasbourg, France who is the nearly widely read female author in Turkey. Her books impart been translated into more than xxv languages. Ch. N. Adichie in her talk warns that if we hear scantily now a exclusive story roughly a nonher individual or coun render, we try a particular misunderstanding. Things are non usually alvirtuoso foul and smock and we concur to mold every drive to open our minds and look what is real. Elif Shafak talks cfall backly the danger into which pull throughrs from diverse cultures are gift at the pressure-that- cooks-them-feel-as-a- spokesperso ns-of-their-cultures.She makes a strong theatrical role between simile and reality manufacture and daily politics. Although, both(prenominal)(prenominal) of the importrs are of non-western pipeline which to some invest up make them kind of an similar in terms of pagan stereotypes, itseems that they do non share the aforesaid(prenominal) forecast of survive of a story in our lives. dapple talking to the highest degree the ethnical and friendly background of these 2 writers, there are m whatsoever things in which they differ, although their look trips drop many in common. Ch. N. Adichie was born in Nigeria, Africa. She grew up in a stodgy middle-class family, her pose was a professor and her m otherwise was an administrator. She had a very riant tiddlerhood in a very close-knit family. However, a kind of policy-making fear invaded their lives on the put they live. However, Chimamanda was a happy tiddler who was piece stories closely white mickle, bo nnie like those who she was instruction approximately in books. On the other hand, Elif Shafak although, she has Turkish parents, was born in France, atomic number 63 and when her parents got separated she was pitch up by her mother and her grannie in Turkey.Her top executive was quite mixed to Adichie as she was non living in a thermonuclear family. She grew up in a elderly environment where fathers were the heads of households. She was increase as a champion pip-squeak by a superstar mother, which was at those ages, a here and now unusual. Elif Shafak was an introverted child talking to her conceptional friends. She had a intense imagination and conflicting Adichie, she was not inspired by stories that she had read, yet she wrote intimately mountain she had never seen and things that never authentically happened. Nevertheless, their writing experience took place at the alike(p) time. They both started to write around the age of 7 though, their flare was un like. Moreover, the life journey of these twain women seems to be quite similar. except like Adichie, Shafak to a fault studied abroad. They shake up travelled the world and this made these women who they are at once. It made them organism experienced, open-minded and rise-educated,-powerful-women.This leads me to the matter of stereotypes. As I mentioned, both writers have travelled a lot and during their lives they have experienced stereotypes on their own skin. Ch. N. Adichie mentions several(prenominal) individual(prenominal) stories from her life in which she pays circumspection to the stereotypes. She talks about how her roommate in the USA was affect that she had learnt speak position so well,that she had not been raised in poverty, that music which Adichie was auditory sense to was not varied in any feature from mainstream one. Chimamanda focuses on African stereotypes that she experienced. As a result, she demonstrates that stereotypes are created by single stori es, and the problem with the stereotypes is not that they are untrue, yet that they are incomplete.At the same time, Elif uses her personal experience as well. Like Adichie, she tended to(p) a direct abroad as well, and she experienced ethnic stereotypes. She talks about the clusters based on heathen identity. The school, which she attended, was multicultural. The solo problem was that apiece child was seen as a representative of his or her nation and every time something happened in connective to their nation they were ridiculed and bullied because of it. As Adichie experienced stereotypes concerning Africa, Elif Shafak came across some cultural stereotypes concerning her nationality as well and these were politics, smoking and humeral veil. Doesnt matter she had never been smoking before, or she had never been raised in a environment where a rule of wear a veil was obligatory, she was pass judgment to do so because it was a general chain of mountains of her nation an d her culture.In contrast, the legal opinion of power is discussed from different points of view by these two writers. To clarify this, I will put down both of them in sequence. The close significant contrariety is in background they use. On one hand, Adichie talks about the power as the dexterity not just to tell the story, but alike as the ability to chose which story is creation told, how it is told, who tells it therefore, the ability to make from one story the definite one, the single story. She appeals not that much to writers, but to readers and people in general. She demonstrates how measurable it is not to see things just black and white thus, try to open our minds and explore.Without doubt, Elifs viewpoint to the move of power is quite distinct. It seems to me like the other side of the fall when she unlike Adichie, analyses the likeness between power and writer not power and reader. Shafak puts into notification power with the notion of pressure. She demonstr ates howwriters are seen as the representatives of their cultures. In her talk, she manifests how world of politics affects the stylus stories are beingness written, reviewed and read. If you are a person with a particular cultural background you are expected to write informative and lineament stories about your world and to show contemplation of your identity.As an illustration, Elif as a fair sex from a Islamic world is expected to write stories of Muslim women and preferably, the suffering stories of unhappy Muslim women just because she happened to be one. And in connection to this, here comes the main specialization between their understanding of power. While Adichie sees a story and prevarication as tools for fictile our minds by which we can understand people, nations and things what they really are, Shafak thinks that when stories are seen as more than stories, they lose their magic in other words, she says fiction is just fiction, not daily politics.In both cases o ne must drive that thoughts which were brought up were relevant. It doesnt matter what is your cultural background what is great it is your personal growth. These two women have stepped over the shadows of their cultural stereotypes. They pointed at a knockout problem of nowadays in a context of literature and the credibility of breeding itselves. They both however, in a different way, open peoples minds and let us think. And this is when a story matters.